![]()
Edward Glassman : Creativity & Innovation Leadership Styles
Creativity & Innovation Depends On Your Leadership Interactions With Your TeamBy Edward Glassman, PhD Creativity & innovation depend on your leadership styles, your roles and behaviors with your subordinates. Four useful styles exist, each with effective behaviors:
Choose your style according to your subordinate's ability, willingness, and confidence to work independently. That is, he or she:
Use the directive style if the person has low abilities to operate independently. Otherwise, use styles that exert less control. What is Your Leadership Style?What is your leadership style? A quick look may reveal your tendencies. Circle the number that best describes how close the style resembles your leadership style.
UNLIKE ME 1 2 3 4 5 LIKE ME I. Directive Leader:
UNLIKE ME 1 2 3 4 5 LIKE ME II. Participative Leader:
UNLIKE ME 1 2 3 4 5 LIKE ME III. Catalytic Leader:
UNLIKE ME 1 2 3 4 5 LIKE ME IV. Non-Directive Leader:I like to concentrate on the big picture and enjoy planning the future. I delegate. I assign tasks or make requests, and allow the people in my work group to work and make decisions on their own. I occasionally monitor their work to stay informed and make sure needed resources are available. I let the people in my work group set their own pace and determine the ways to accomplish their work assignments. I interact minimally in a straightforward factual way, with little or no daily contact. I ensure that disruptions beyond my work group's control do not occur. I do not make decisions or solve problems for my work group. Sometimes they perceive me as avoiding, withdrawing, permissive or indifferent. ADJUST YOUR STYLE: To help your team become more creative and effective, use skills from all four styles. How can you learn to do this? Add skills one at a time. For example, you might learn...
What spoils you team's creative thinking, or what stimulates creative thought? Ask your team, directly or with questionnaires in my book. Some people will respond they want more freedom of choice: time to think creatively; freedom to choose what to work on; freedom to decide how to accomplish goals. Some caution, however. First: Farris1 reported that the most innovative N.A.S.A. teams, as judged by senior management, included mainly those whose supervisors' styles remained moderate, neither too tight nor too loose. Second: Andrews and Pelz2 found that scientists in industry who were judged most effective by others in terms of scientific contributions and usefulness to the organization, had moderate controls, neither too tight nor too loose. See also my books on 'Team Creativity At Work' and Glassman3 for a summary of this topic. (1 Farris, G. F. (1973) The Technical Supervisor. Technical Review 75 (5), April Issue.) (2 Pelz, D. C. and F. M. Andrews (1976) Scientists In Organizations. Institute for Social Research. University of Michigan.) (3 See my books on 'Team Creativity At Work' and my article Glassman, Edward (1986) "Managing for creative thinking: Back to basics in R&D." R&D Management. Volume 16: pages 175-183.) This research indicates that the leadership habit of exercising too little control works less well. In other words, for highly innovative outcomes, complete freedom of choice does less well than moderate freedom combined with supportive consultations. • © 2010 by Edward Glassman. All rights reserved. Edward Glassman is a former Guggenheim Fellow at Stanford University and a Visiting Fellow at The Center For Creative Leadership in Greensboro, North Carolina. ... 10/15/10 |